Hardin County Soils
SDE Feature Class - hardin.hac_soils
FGDC, ESRI Metadata
DescriptionSpatialData StructureData QualityData SourceData DistributionMetadata
+ Resource Description
Citation
Information used to reference the data.
Title: Hardin County Soils
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publication date: 20060710
Data type: vector digital data
Data location: LOJIC GIS Database
Other citation details:
ky621
Description
A characterization of the data, including its intended use and limitations.
Abstract:
This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most
detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National
Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing
maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base
and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely
sensed and other information.

This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and
computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area
extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory
of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable
pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at
the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line
features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features
too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large
enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and
management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the
National Soil Information System relational database, which gives
the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.
Purpose:
SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of
soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO
product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Supplemental information:
Digital versions of hydrography, cultural features, and other
associated layers that are not part of the SSURGO data set may be
available from the primary organization listed in the Point of
Contact.
Language of dataset: en
Point Of Contact
Contact information for the individual or organization that is knowledgeable about the data.
Organization: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Position: State Soil Scientist
Phone: 859 224-7369
Telecommunications Device or Teletypewriter (TDD/TTY) phone: (202) 720-2600
Email: bill.craddock@ky.usda.gov
Address type: mailing address
Address:
771 Corporate Dr. STE 110
City: Lexington
State or Province: KY
Postal code: 40503
Data Type
How the data are represented, formatted and maintained by the data producing organization.
File or table name: hardin.hac_soils
Data type: vector digital data
Data format: SDE Feature Class
Native dataset environment: Microsoft Windows 2000 Version 5.2 (Build 3790) Service Pack 2; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.2.4.1420
Time Period of Data
Time period(s) for which the data corresponds to the currentness reference.
Beginning date: 20040430
Ending date: 20060710
Currentness reference:
publication date
Status
The state of and maintenance information for the data.
Data status: Complete
Update frequency: As needed
Key Words
Words or phrases that summarize certain aspects of the data.
Theme:
Keywords: soil survey, soils, Soil Survey Geographic, SSURGO
Keyword thesaurus: None
Place:
Keywords: Kentucky, Hardin County, Kosmosdale SW Quadrangle, Fort Knox NW Quadrangle, Fort Knox NE Quadrangle, Pitts Point NW Quadrangle, Fort Knox SW Quadrangle, Fort Knox SE Quadrangle, Pitts Point SW Quadrangle, Flaherty NE Quadrangle, Vine Grove NW Quadrangle, Vine Grove NE Quadrangle, Colesburg NW Quadrangle, Colesburg NE Quadrangle, Lebanon Junction NW Quadrangle, Big Spring SE Quadrangle, Flaherty SW Quadrangle, Flaherty SE Quadrangle, Vine Grove SW Quadrangle, Vine Grove SE Quadrangle, Colesburg SW Quadrangle, Colesburg SE Quadrangle, Lebanon Junction SW Quadrangle, Lebanon Junction SE Quadrangle, Constantine NW Quadrangle, Constantine NE Quadrangle, Howe Valley NW Quadrangle, Howe Valley NE Quadrangle, Cecilia NW Quadrangle, Cecilia NE Quadrangle, Elizabethtown NW Quadrangle, Elizabethtown NE Quadrangle, Nelsonville NW Quadrangle, Nelsonville NE Quadrangle, Custer SE Quadrangle, Constantine SW Quadrangle, Constantine SE Quadrangle, Howe Valley SW Quadrangle, Howe Valley SE Quadrangle, Cecilia SW Quadrangle, Cecilia SE Quadrangle, Elizabethtown SW Quadrangle, Elizabethtown SE Quadrangle, Nelsonville SW Quadrangle, Madrid NE Quadrangle, Big Clifty NW Quadrangle, Big Clifty NE Quadrangle, Summit NW Quadrangle, Summit NE Quadrangle, Sonora NW Quadrangle, Sonora NE Quadrangle, Tonieville NW Quadrangle, Tonieville NE Quadrangle, Big Clifty SW Quadrangle, Big Clifty SE Quadrangle, Summit SW Quadrangle, Summit SE Quadrangle, Sonora SW Quadrangle, Sonora SE Quadrangle, Tonieville SW Quadrangle, Raywick SW Quadrangle, Millerstown NW Quadrangle, Millerstown NE Quadrangle, Upton NW Quadrangle, Upton NE Quadrangle
Keyword thesaurus: USGS Geographic Names Information System (GNIS)
Data Access Constraints
Restrictions and legal prerequisites for accessing or using the data after access is granted.
Access constraints:
None
Use constraints:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, should be acknowledged as the data source in products
derived from these data.

This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool
in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference
source. This is public information and may be interpreted by
organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on
needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate
application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to
reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any
authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps
for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.

Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater
than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation
of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The
depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from
them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and
detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data
and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only.
Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and
users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.
+ Spatial Reference Information
Horizontal Coordinate System
Reference system from which linear or angular quantities are measured and assigned to the position that a point occupies.
Projected coordinate system:
Name: NAD 1983 StatePlane Kentucky North FIPS 1601 Feet
Map units: survey feet
Geographic coordinate system:
Name: GCS North American 1983
Coordinate System Details
Map projection
Map projection name: Lambert Conformal Conic
Standard parallel: 37.966667
Standard parallel: 38.966667
Longitude of central meridian: -84.250000
Latitude of projection origin: 37.500000
False easting: 1640416.666667
False northing: 0.000000
Planar Coordinate Information
Planar coordinate encoding method: coordinate pair
Coordinate representation:
Abscissa resolution: 0.001250
Ordinate resolution: 0.001250
Planar distance units: survey feet
Geodetic model
Horizontal datum name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major axis: 6378137.000000
Denominator of flattening ratio: 298.257222
Vertical Coordinate System
Reference system from which vertical distances (altitudes or depths) are measured.
Altitude system definition:
Altitude resolution: 1.000000
Altitude encoding method: Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates
Spatial Domain
The geographic areal domain of the data that describes the western, eastern, northern, and southern geographic limits of data coverage.
Bounding Coordinates
In Projected or local coordinates
NAD 1983 StatePlane Kentucky North FIPS 1601 Feet
BoundaryCoordinate
Left 1052941.130000 (survey feet)
Right 1227961.140000 (survey feet)
Top 188414.475000 (survey feet)
Bottom -17543.473750 (survey feet)
In Unprojected coordinates (geographic)
GCS North American 1983
BoundaryCoordinate
West-86.288851 (longitude)
East-85.670533 (longitude)
North38.008591 (latitude)
South37.434108 (latitude)
+ Data Structure and Attribute Information
Overview
Summary of the information content of the data, including other references to complete descriptions of entity types, attributes, and attribute values for the data.
Entity and attribute overview:
Map Unit Delineations are closed polygons that may be dominated
by a single soil or miscellaneous area component plus allowable
similar or dissimilar soils, or they can be geographic mixtures
of groups of soils or soils and miscellaneous areas.

The map unit symbol uniquely identifies each closed map unit
delineation. Each symbol corresponds to a map unit name. The
map unit key is used to link to information in the National
Soil Information System tables.

Map Unit Delineations are described by the National Soil
Information System database. This attribute database gives the
proportionate extent of the component soils and the properties for
each soil. The database contains both estimated and measured data
on the physical and chemical soil properties and soil
interpretations for engineering, water management, recreation,
agronomic, woodland, range, and wildlife uses of the soil.

The National Soil Information System database contains static
metadata. It documents the data structure and includes such
information as what tables, columns, indexes, and relationships
are defined as well as a variety of attributes of each of these
database objects. Attributes include table and column
descriptions and detailed domain information.

The National Soil Information System database also contains a
distribution metadata. It records the criteria used for selecting
map units and components for inclusion in the set of distributed
data.

Special features are described in the feature table.  It includes an
area symbol, feature label, feature name, and feature description for
each special and ad hoc feature in the survey area.
Entity and attribute detailed citation:
Soil Taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and
interpreting soil surveys. Agricultural Handbook 436, 1999, USDA, SCS.

Keys to Soil Taxonomy (current issue), USDA, SCS.

National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, part 647 (current
issue), USDA, NRCS.

Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.
Direct spatial reference method: Vector
Attributes of hardin.hac_soils
Detailed descriptions of entity type, attributes, and attribute values for the data.
Name: hardin.hac_soils
Type of object: Feature Class
Geometry type: Polygon
Number of records: 16834
Description:
Special Soil Features represent soil, miscellaneous area, or landform
features that are too small to be digitized as soil delineations
(area features).
Source:
Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.
Attributes
Shape
Definition:
Feature geometry.
Attribute values: Coordinates defining the features.
Attribute definition source:
ESRI
MUSYM
Type: String Width: 6
MUKEY
Type: String Width: 30
SOIL_CLASS
Definition:
Abbreviation for the soil name
Type: String Width: 5
SOIL_CAP
Definition:
The nonirrigated land capability classification. It does not include the Capability Subclass.
Type: String Width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
I
Soils have slight limitations that restrict their use
II
Soils have moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or require moderate conservation practices.
III
Soils have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or require very careful management, or both.
IV
Soils have very severe limitations that restrict the choice of plants or require very careful management, or both
V
Soils have little or no hazard of erosion but have other limitations, impractical to remove, that limit their use mainly to pasture, range, forestland, or wildlife food and cover.
VI
Soils have severe limitations that make them generally unsuited to cultivation and that limit their use mainly to pasture, range, forestland, or wildlife food and cover.
VII
Soils have very severe limitations that make them unsuited to cultivation and that their use mainly to grazing, forestland, or wildlife.
VIII
Soils and miscellaneous areas have limitations that preclude their use for commercial plant production and limit their use to recreation, wildlife, or water supply or for esthetic purposes.
NA
Not Applicable
HYDRO_GRP
Definition:
Hydrologic Group
Type: String Width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
A
(Low runoff potential)  The soils have a high infilitration rate even when thoroughly wetted.  They chiefly consist of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravels.  They have a high rate of water transmission.
B
The soils have a moderate infilitration rate when thoroughly wetted.  They chiefly are moderately deep to deep, moderately well drained to well drained soils that have moderately fine to moderately coarse textures.  They have a moderate rate of water transmission.
C
The soils have a slow infilitration rate when thoroughly wetted.  They chiefly have a layer that impedes downward movement of water or have moderately fine to fine texture.  They have a slow rate of water transmission.
D
(High runoff potential)  The soils have a very slow infilitration rate when thoroughly wetted.  They chiefly consist of clay soils that have a high swelling potential, soils that have a permanent high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material.  They have a very slow rate of water transmission.
A/D, B/D, and C/D
Dual hydrologic groups are given for certain wet soils that can be adequately drained.  The first letter applies to the drained condition, the second to the undrained.  Only soils that are rated D in their natural condition are assigned to dual classes.  Soils may be assigned to dual groups if drainage is feasible and practical.
NA
Not Applicable
HYDRIC
Definition:
Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (Federal Register, 1994). THese soils, under natural conditions, are either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation.
Type: String Width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
NA
Not Applicable
DNMHC
Does not meet Hydric Criteria
H
Hydric Soil
DESCRIPT
Definition:
Brief Description of the soil
Type: String Width: 100
SLOPE
Definition:
Slope of the soil. The slope is usually listed as a percentage range.
Type: String Width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
A
0 - 2 percent slope
B
0 - 4 percent slope
C
0 - 6 percent slope
D
0 -12 percent slope
E
0 -50 percent slope
F
2 - 6 percent slope
G
2 - 25 percent slope
H
2 - 75 percent slope
I
6 -12 percent slope
J
12 -20 percent slope
K
12 - 25 percent slope
L
12 - 50 percent slope
M
12 - 60 percent slope
N
20 - 50 percent slope
O
25 - 50 percent slope
P
25 -55 percent slope
Q
25 - 60 percent slope
R
12 percent slope
NA
Not Applicable
S
30 - 60 percent slope
T
20 - 30 percent slope
U
12 - 30 percent slope
V
6 - 20 percent slope
W
20 - 40 percent slope
X
10 - 30 percent slope
Y
30 - 65 percent slope
Z
0 -3 percent slope
ZA
6 - 15 percent slope
ZB
12 - 35 percent slope
ZC
4 - 12 percent slope
ZD
30 -90 percent slope
ZE
20 -65 percent slope
ZF
30 - 80 percent slope
ZG
7 - 30 percent slope
LCSUBCLASS
Definition:
The secondary category in the land capability classification system.
Type: String Width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
e
Subclass e is made up of soils for which the susceptibility to erosion is the dominant problem or hazard affecting their use.  Erosion susceptibility and past erosion damage are the major soil factors that affect soils in this subclass.
w
Subclass w is made up of soils for which excess water is the dominant hazard or limitation affecting their use.  Poor soil drainage, wetness, a high water table, and overflow are the factors that affect soils in this subclass.
s
Subclass s is made up of soils that have soil limitations within the rooting zone, such as shallowness of the rooting zone, stones, low moisture-holding capacity, low fertility that is difficult to correct, and salinity or sodium content.
c
Subclass c is made up of soils for which the climate (the temperature or lack of moisture) is the major hazard or limitation affecting their use.
NA
Not Applicable
NONE
No Subclass is designated
LANDCAP
Definition:
Nonirrigated land capability classification. Includes the Capability Subclass. Also known as the Map Unit.
Type: String Width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
1
See attribute definitions for SOIL_CAP &  LCSUBCLASS
2e
See attribute definitions for SOIL_CAP &  LCSUBCLASS
2w
See attribute definitions for SOIL_CAP &  LCSUBCLASS
3e
See attribute definitions for SOIL_CAP &  LCSUBCLASS
3w
See attribute definitions for SOIL_CAP &  LCSUBCLASS
4e
See attribute definitions for SOIL_CAP &  LCSUBCLASS
4w
See attribute definitions for SOIL_CAP &  LCSUBCLASS
5w
See attribute definitions for SOIL_CAP &  LCSUBCLASS
6e
See attribute definitions for SOIL_CAP &  LCSUBCLASS
7e
See attribute definitions for SOIL_CAP &  LCSUBCLASS
NA
Not Applicable
SOIL_KIND
Definition:
Soils differ in size and shape of their areas, in degree of contrast with adjacent soils, and in geographic relationships. Four kinds of map units are used in soil surveys to show the relationshups: consociations, complexes, associations, and undifferentiated groups.
Type: String Width: 25
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
Consociations
In a consociation, delineated areas are dominated by a single soil taxon (or miscellsneous area) and similar soils.  As a rule, at least one-half of the pedons in each delineation of a soil consociation are of the same soil components that provide the name for the map unit.  Most of the remainder of the delineation consists of soil components so similar to the named soil that major intrepretations are not affected significantly.
Complexes and associations
Complexes and associations consist of two or more dissimilar components occurring in a regularly repeating pattern.  Only the following arbitrary rule related to mapping scale determines whether the name complex or association should be used.  The major components of a complex cannot be mapped separately at a scale of about 1:24,000.  The major components of an association can be separated at a scale of about 1:24,000.  In either case, the major components are sufficiently different in morphology or behavior that the map unit cannot be called a consociation.  In each delineation of either a complex or an association, each major component is normally present, through their proportions may vary appreciably from one delineation to another.  The total amount of inclusions in a map unit that are dissimilar to any of the major components does not exceed about 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if nonlimiting, and a single kind of dissimilar limiting inclusion generally does not exceed 10 percent if very contrasting.
Not Classified
No soil classification.  Represents map polygons that are water bodies, thus no soil is involved.
Undifferentiated
Undifferentiated groups consist of two or more components that are not consistently associated geographically and, therefore, do not always occur together in the same map delineation. These components are included in the same named map unit because their use and management are the same or very similar for common uses. Generally, they are grouped together because some common feature, such as steepness, stoniness, or flooding, determines their use and management. If two or more very steep soils that are geographically separated are so similar in their potentials for use and management that defining two or more additional map units would serve no useful purpose, they may be included in the same unit. Each delineation has at least one of the major components, and some may have all of them. The same principles regarding the proportion of minor components that apply to consociations also apply to undifferentiated groups.
FLOODED_A
Definition:
Potential of primary soil to be flooded.
Type: String Width: 25
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
NA
Not Applicable
FREQUENTLY
Frequently Flooded
NOT
Not Flooded
OCCASIONALLY
Occasionally Flooded
RARELY
Rarely Flooded
FLOODED_B
Definition:
Potential of secondary soil, if any to be flooded.
Type: String Width: 25
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
NA
Not Applicable
FREQUENTLY
Frequently Flooded
NOT
Not Flooded
OCCASIONALLY
Occasionally Flooded
RARELY
Rarely Flooded
PONDED_A
Definition:
Potential of primary soil to be ponded.
Type: String Width: 25
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
NA
Not Applicable
NOT
Not Ponded
RARELY
Rarely Ponded
PONDED_B
Definition:
Potential of secondary soil, if any to be ponded.
Type: String Width: 25
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
NA
Not Applicable
NOT
Not Ponded
OCCASIONALLY
Occasionally Ponded
ROCKY
Definition:
Soil Rocky Classification
Type: String Width: 10
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
Very
Soil is Very Rocky
Not Class
Soil is not classified as rocky
NA
Not Applicable
ACRES
Definition:
Area of specific soil polygon in acres
Type: Float Width: 19 Number of decimals: 11
FARM
Definition:
Soils that are considered as prime and other important farmlands. Prime farmland is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops and that is available for these uses.
Type: String Width: 150
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
All Areas are prime farmland
Farmland classification
Farmland of statewide importance
Farmland classification
Not prime farmland
Soil not considered as prime farmland
Prime farmland if drained
Farmland classification
Prime farmland if protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season
Farmland classification
Prime farmland if irrigated
Farmland classification
Prime farmland if drained and either protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season
Farmland classification
EROSION
Definition:
Soil erosion condition
Type: Number Width: 4
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
0
Soil not classified as to be eroded.
2
Soil is eroded
3
Soil is severely eroded
OBJECTID
Definition:
Internal feature number.
Alias: OBJECTID Type: OID Width: 4 Precision: 10 Scale: 0
Attribute values: Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute definition source:
ESRI
SLOPE_DES
Definition:
Description of the soil slope
Type: String Width: 50
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
NA
Not Applicable
Text of Slope Range
See attribute "SLOPE" for slope range values
SHAPE
Definition:
Feature geometry.
Alias: SHAPE Type: Geometry Width: 4 Precision: 0 Scale: 0
Attribute values: Coordinates defining the features.
Attribute definition source:
ESRI
SHAPE.AREA
Alias: SHAPE.AREA Type: Double Width: 0 Precision: 0 Scale: 0
SHAPE.LEN
Alias: SHAPE.LEN Type: Double Width: 0 Precision: 0 Scale: 0
ESRI Feature Description
Description of spatial objects in the data using the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) terminology.
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) terms
hardin.hac_soils
ESRI feature type: Simple
Geometry type: Polygon
Topology: FALSE
Feature count: 16834
Spatial index: TRUE
Linear referencing: FALSE
SDTS Feature Description
Description of point and vector spatial objects in the data using the Spatial Data Transfer Standards (SDTS) terminology.
Spatial data transfer standard (SDTS) terms
hardin.hac_soils
Type: G-polygon
Count: 16834
+ Data Quality and Accuracy Information
General
Information about the fidelity of relationships, data quality and accuracy tests, omissions, selection criteria, generalization, and definitions used to derive the data.
Logical consistency report:
Certain node/geometry and topology GT-polygon/chain relationships
are collected or generated to satisfy topological requirements
(the GT-polygon corresponds to the soil delineation). Some of these
requirements include: chains must begin and end at nodes, chains
must connect to each other at nodes, chains do not extend through
nodes, left and right GT-polygons are defined for each chain
element and are consistent throughout, and the chains representing
the limits of the file are free of gaps. The tests of logical
consistency are performed using vendor software. All internal
polygons are tested for closure with vendor software and are checked
on hard copy plots. All data are checked for common soil lines (i.e.,
adjacent polygons with the same label). Edge locations generally do
not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch.
The Hardin and Larue Counties, Kentucky soil survey has an acceptable
join with the adjacent survey of Harrison County, Indiana.
Completeness report:
A map unit is a collection of areas defined and named in terms of
their soil components or miscellaneous areas or both. Each map
unit differs in some respect from all others in a survey area and
each map unit has a symbol that uniquely identifies the map unit
on a soil map. Each individual area, point, or line so identified
on the map is a delineation.

Soil Scientists identify small areas of soils or miscellaneous areas
that have properties and behavior significantly different than the
named soils in the surrounding map unit. These minor components
may be indicated as special features. If they have a minimal effect
on use and management, or could not be precisely located, they may
not be indicated on the map.

A map unit has specified kinds of soils or miscellaneous areas
(map unit components), each with a designated range in
proportionate extent. Map units include one or more kinds of soil
or miscellaneous area. Miscellaneous areas are areas that have little
or no recognizable soil.

Specific National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures
were used in the classification of soils, design and name of map
units, and location of special soil features. These standards are
outlined in Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993,
USDA, NRCS; Agricultural Handbook 436, Soil Taxonomy, 1995,
USDA, NRCS; and all Amendments; Keys to Soil Taxonomy,
(current issue) USDA, NRCS; National Soil Survey
Handbook, title 430-VI,(current issue) USDA, NRCS.

The actual composition and interpretive purity of the map unit
delineations were based on data collected by scientists during
the course of preparing the soil maps. Adherence to National
Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures is based on
peer review, quality control, and quality assurance. Quality
control is outlined in the memorandum of understanding for the
soil survey area and in documents that reside with the Natural
Resources Conservation Service state soil scientist. Four kinds
of map units are used in soil surveys: consociations, complexes,
associations, and undifferentiated groups.

Consociations - Consociations are named for the dominant soil.
In a consociation, delineated areas use a single name from the
dominant component in the map unit. Dissimilar components are
minor in extent. The soil component in a consociation may be
identified at any taxonomic level. Soil series is the lowest
taxonomic level. A consociation that is named as a miscellaneous
area is dominantly that kind of area and minor components do not
significantly affect the use of the map unit. The total amount of
dissimilar inclusions of other components in a map unit generally
does not exceed about 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if
nonlimiting. A single component of a dissimilar limiting inclusion
generally does not exceed 10 percent if very contrasting.

Complexes and associations - Complexes and associations consist
of two or more  dissimilar components that occur in a regularly
repeating pattern. The total amount of other dissimilar components
is minor extent. The following arbitrary rule determines whether
complex or association is used in the name. The major components
of an association can be separated at the scale of mapping. In
either case, because the major components are sufficiently different
in morphology or behavior, the map unit cannot be called a
consociation. In each delineation of a complex or an association,
each major component is normally present though their proportions
may vary appreciably from one delineation to another. The total
amount of inclusions in a map unit that are dissimilar to any of
the major components does not exceed 15 percent if limiting and
25 percent if nonlimiting. A single kind of dissimilar limiting
inclusion usually does not exceed 10 percent.

Undifferentiated groups - Undifferentiated groups consist of two
or more components that are not consistently associated
geographically and, therefore, do not always occur together in
the same map delineation. These components are included in the
same named map unit because their use and management are the same
or very similar for common uses. Generally they are grouped together
because some common feature, such as steepness, stoniness, or
flooding, determines their use and management. If two or more
additional map units would serve no useful purpose, they may be
included in the same unit. Each delineation has at least one of the
major components, and some may have all of them. The same principles
regarding the proportion of minor components that apply to
consociations also apply to undifferentiated groups. The same
principles regarding proportion of inclusion apply to
undifferentiated groups as to consociations.

Minimum documentation consists of three complete soil profile
descriptions that are collected for each soil added to the legend,
one additional per 3,000 acres mapped; three 10 observation
transects for each map unit, one additional 10 point transect per
3,000 acres.

A defined standard or level of confidence in the interpretive
purity of the map unit delineations is attained by adjusting the
kind and intensity of field investigations. Field investigations
and data collection are carried out in sufficient detail to name
map units and to identify accurately and consistently areas of
about 4 acres.
Attribute Accuracy
Accuracy of the identification of data entities, features and assignment of attribute values.
Attribute accuracy report:
Attribute accuracy is tested by manual
comparison of the source with hard copy plots and/or symbolized
display of the map data on an interactive computer graphic system.
Selected attributes that cannot be visually verified on plots or
on screen are interactively queried and verified on screen. In
addition, the attributes are tested against a master set of valid
attributes. All attribute data conform to the attribute codes in
the signed classification and correlation document and amendment(s).
Positional Accuracy
Accuracy of the positional aspects of the data.
Horizontal accuracy report:
The accuracy of these digital data is based upon their
compilation to base maps that meet National Map
Accuracy Standards at a scale of 1 inch equals 1,000
feet. The difference in positional accuracy between the
soil boundaries and special soil features locations in the
field and their digitized map locations is unknown. The
locational accuracy of soil delineations on the ground varies
with the transition between map units.

For example, on long gently sloping landscapes the transition
occurs gradually over many feet. Where landscapes change
abruptly from steep to level, the transition will be very
narrow. Soil delineation boundaries and special soil features
generally were digitized within 0.01 inch of their locations on
the digitizing source. The digital map elements are edge matched
between data sets. The data along each quadrangle edge are
matched against the data for the adjacent quadrangle. Edge
locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline
by more than 0.01 inch.
+ Data Source and Process Information
Data Sources
Information about the source data used to construct or derive the data.
Data source information
USGS1
Title: multiple orthophotographs
Originators: U.S. Geological Survey
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication place: Menlo Park, California
Publication date: 1997-1998
Data type: remote sensing image
Map scale denominator: 12,000
Media: stable-base material
Source contribution:
compilation base material
Beginning date: 2002
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
NRCS1
Title: ratioed film positives of publication negatives
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication date: unpublished material
Data type: map
Map scale denominator: 12,000
Media: stable-base material
Source contribution:
source material for compilation
Beginning date: 2002
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
2004
SCS1
Title: Soil Survey of Hardin and Larue Counties, Kentucky
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Government Printing Office
Publication place: Washington, D.C.
Publication date: 1979
Data type: atlas
Map scale denominator: 20,000
Media: paper
Source contribution:
information on soil map unit delineations, data on
soil properties, and locations of special features
Beginning date: 2002
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
NRCS2
Title: multiple annotated overlays
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication date: unpublished material
Data type: map
Map scale denominator: 12,000
Media: stable-base material
Source contribution:
scanning source material
Beginning date: 2002
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
2004
NASIS
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publication date: 2004
Data type: unknown
Media: database
Source contribution:
attribute (tabular) information
Beginning date: 2004
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
Process Steps
Information about events, parameters, tolerances and techniques applied to construct or derive the data.
Process step information
Process Step 1
Process description:
Hardin and Larue Counties, kentucky had a previously published soil
survey, 1979, at a 1:20,000 scale. An evaluation was made of the
survey in 2002. It was determined that soil map unit delineations
and map unit components were accurate.
Process date: 2002
Data Source used
SCS1
Title: Soil Survey of Hardin and Larue Counties, Kentucky
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Government Printing Office
Publication place: Washington, D.C.
Publication date: 1979
Data type: atlas
Map scale denominator: 20,000
Media: paper
Source contribution:
information on soil map unit delineations, data on
soil properties, and locations of special features
Beginning date: 2002
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
Process Step 2
Process description:
1:12,000 scale ratioed film positives were made from the publication
negatives. Ratioed positives were manually compiled to 1:12,000
stable base annotated overlays registered to 1:12,000 orthophoto
quarter quadrangles (NAD83). Soil map unit delineation overlays were
raster scanned by Midwest Graphics in Milwaukee, Wisconsin at a 200
dpi resolution. Special features were manually digitized at a
resolution of 0.01 inch. Raster editing, neatline development,
labeling, edgematching, and vector conversion were done in LT4X
Version 4.10. The data were written to Digital Line Graph Optional
(DLG-3) format and imported as coverages in ArcInfo 7.2.1 for review
and further editing. Digitizing, editing, and reviewing for adherance
to SSURGO standards were conducted by USDA-NRCS staff at the Virginia
Digitizing Unit in Richmond, VA. The data were forwarded to the Soil
Data Warehouse.
Process date: 2004
Data Source used
SCS1, NRCS1, USGS1, NRCS2
Process Step 3
Process description:
The National Soil Information System (NASIS) database was developed
by Natural Resources Conservation Service soil scientists according
to national standards.
Process date: 2004
Data Source used
SCS1
Title: Soil Survey of Hardin and Larue Counties, Kentucky
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Government Printing Office
Publication place: Washington, D.C.
Publication date: 1979
Data type: atlas
Map scale denominator: 20,000
Media: paper
Source contribution:
information on soil map unit delineations, data on
soil properties, and locations of special features
Beginning date: 2002
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
Process Step 4
Process description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Process date: 20040512
Data Source used
NASIS
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publication date: 2004
Data type: unknown
Media: database
Source contribution:
attribute (tabular) information
Beginning date: 2004
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
Process Step 5
Process description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Process date: 20040517
Data Source used
NASIS
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publication date: 2004
Data type: unknown
Media: database
Source contribution:
attribute (tabular) information
Beginning date: 2004
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
Process Step 6
Process description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Process date: 20051205
Data Source used
NASIS
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publication date: 2004
Data type: unknown
Media: database
Source contribution:
attribute (tabular) information
Beginning date: 2004
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
Process Step 7
Process description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.

Tabular data has been revised from the previous version on the Soil Data Mart to include minor components for each mapunit; and the mapunit Nontechnical Soil Descriptions and pasture and hayland suitability groups. Also included is a change to the mined soils interpretations to account for the potential hazard of differential settlement.  Hydric components have been edited to include landform where it was not included in the previous version.
Process date: 20051207
Data Source used
NASIS
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publication date: 2004
Data type: unknown
Media: database
Source contribution:
attribute (tabular) information
Beginning date: 2004
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
Process Step 8
Process description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Process date: 20060707
Data Source used
NASIS
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publication date: 2004
Data type: unknown
Media: database
Source contribution:
attribute (tabular) information
Beginning date: 2004
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
Process Step 9
Process description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.

Tabular data has been revised from the previous version on the Soil Data Mart to meet requirements for National Program Applications as outlined in National Bulletin 430-5-7 dated August 25, 2005.
Process date: 20060707
Data Source used
NASIS
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publication date: 2004
Data type: unknown
Media: database
Source contribution:
attribute (tabular) information
Beginning date: 2004
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
Process Step 10
Process description:
The tabular data were extracted from the data mart without change. The spatial data's coordinate system was transformed to UTM Zone 16, Northern Hemisphere (NAD 83) using ESRI ArcObjects 8.3 "ConvertFeatureClass" and exported to an ESRI shapefile.
Process date: 20070717
Data Source used
NASIS
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Originators: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publication date: 2004
Data type: unknown
Media: database
Source contribution:
attribute (tabular) information
Beginning date: 2004
Ending date: 2004
Currentness reference:
publication date
Process Step 11
Process description:
Metadata imported.
Data Source used
C:\DOCUME~1\ackerman\LOCALS~1\Temp\xml1BC.tmp
Process Step 12
Process description:
Metadata imported.
Data Source used
C:\Jeffs_Work\Intern_Soils\Hardin_Soils\hac_metadata.xml
Process Step 13
Process description:
Dataset copied.
Data Source used
C:\Jeffs_Work\Intern_Soils\Hardin_Soils\hac_soils
Process Step 14
Process description:
Metadata imported.
Data Source used
R:\metrolib\hardin\hac_soils.shp.xml
Process Step 15
Process description:
Dataset copied.
Data Source used
Server=lojicora1; Service=esri_sde; User=hardin; Version=SDE.DEFAULT
Process Step 16
Process description:
Dataset copied.
Data Source used
Server=lojicora1; Service=esri_sde; User=hardin; Version=SDE.DEFAULT
+ Data Distribution Information
General
Description of the data known by the party from whom the data may be obtained, liability of party distributing data, and technical capabilities required to use the data.
Resource description:
Hardin and Larue Counties, Kentucky SSURGO
Distribution liability:
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer
system at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, no warranty expressed
or implied is made by the Agency regarding the utility of the data
on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute
any such warranty. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will warrant
the delivery of this product in computer readable format, and will
offer appropriate adjustment of credit when the product is determined
unreadable by correctly adjusted computer input peripherals, or
when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. Request
for adjustment of credit must be made within 90 days from the date
of this shipment from the ordering site.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor any of its agencies are
liable for misuse of the data, for damage, for transmission of
viruses, or for computer contamination through the distribution of
these data sets. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits
discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race,
color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political
beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all
prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Distribution Point of Contact
Contact information for the individual or organization distributing the data.
Organization: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center
Phone: 800 672 5559
Fax: 817 509 3469
Telecommunications Device or Teletypewriter (TDD/TTY) phone: 202 720 2600
Address type: mailing and physical address
Address:
501 West Felix Street, Building 23, P.O. Box 6567
City: Fort Worth
State or Province: Texas
Postal code: 76115
Standard Order Process
Common ways in which data may be obtained.
Digital form:
Format name: ArcView shapefile
Format information content:
spatial
Size of the data: 22.989
Transfer size: 34.5
File decompression technique: WinZip or equivalent
Digital transfer option:
Online option:
Computer information:
Network address:
Access instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message.
Digital form:
Format name: ARC/INFO coverage
Format information content:
spatial
Size of the data: 22.989
Transfer size: 34.5
File decompression technique: WinZip or equivalent
Digital transfer option:
Online option:
Computer information:
Network address:
Access instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message.
Digital form:
Format name: ARC/INFO interchange file
Format information content:
spatial
Size of the data: 22.989
Transfer size: 34.5
File decompression technique: WinZip or equivalent
Digital transfer option:
Online option:
Computer information:
Network address:
Access instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message.
Digital form:
Format name: ASCII
Format information content:
keys and attributes
Size of the data: 22.989
Transfer size: 10.2
File decompression technique: WinZip or equivalent
Digital transfer option:
Online option:
Computer information:
Network address:
Access instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message.
Fees: There is currently no direct charge for requesting data or for retrieval via FTP.
Ordering instructions:
Visit the above mentioned Internet Web Site, select state or 
territory, then select individual soil survey area of interest. 
Spatial line data and locations of special feature symbols are in 
ESRI ArcGIS (ArcView,ArcInfo) shapefile, coverage and interchange 
(i.e., export) formats. The National Soil Information System 
attribute soil data are available in variable length, pipe 
delimited, ASCII file format.
Turnaround: Typically within four hours
+ Metadata Reference
Metadata Date
Dates associated with creating, updating and reviewing the metadata.
Last updated: 20080826
Language of metadata: en
Metadata Point of Contact
Contact information for the individual or organization responsible for the metadata information.
Organization: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Person: REQUIRED: The person responsible for the metadata information.
Position: State Soil Scientist
Phone: 859 224-7369
Telecommunications Device or Teletypewriter (TDD/TTY) phone: (202) 720-2600
Email: bill.craddock@ky.usda.gov
Address type: mailing address
Address:
771 Corporate Dr. STE 110
City: Lexington
State or Province: KY
Postal code: 40503
Metadata Standards
Description of the metadata standard used to document the data and reference to any additional extended profiles to the standard used by the metadata producer.
Standard name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Standard version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Time convention: local time
Metadata profiles defining additonal information:
Profile: ESRI Metadata Profile
Profile: ESRI Metadata Profile
FGDC Plus Metadata Stylesheet
Stylesheet: FGDC Plus Stylesheet
File name: FGDC Plus.xsl
Version: 2.2
Description: This metadata is displayed using the FGDC Plus Stylesheet, which is an XSL template that can be used with ArcGIS software to display metadata. It displays metadata elements defined in the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM) - aka FGDC Standard, the ESRI Profile of CSDGM, the Biological Data Profile of CSDGM, and the Shoreline Data Profile of CSDGM. CSDGM is the US Federal Metadata standard. The Federal Geographic Data Committee originally adopted the CSDGM in 1994 and revised it in 1998. According to Executive Order 12096 all Federal agencies are ordered to use this standard to document geospatial data created as of January, 1995. The standard is often referred to as the FGDC Metadata Standard and has been implemented beyond the federal level with State and local governments adopting the metadata standard as well. The Biological Data Profile broadens the application of the CSDGM so that it is more easily applied to biological data that are not explicitly geographic (laboratory results, field notes, specimen collections, research reports) but can be associated with a geographic location. Includes taxonomical vocabulary. The Shoreline Data Profile addresses variability in the definition and mapping of shorelines by providing a standardized set of terms and data elements required to support metadata for shoreline and coastal data sets. The FGDC Plus Stylesheet includes the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set. It supports W3C DOM compatible browsers such as IE7, IE6, Netscape 7, and Mozilla Firefox. It is in the public domain and may be freely used, modified, and redistributed. It is provided "AS-IS" without warranty or technical support.
Instructions: On the top of the page, click on the title of the dataset to toggle opening and closing of all metadata content sections or click section links listed horizontally below the title to open individual sections. Click on a section name (e.g. Description) to open and close section content. Within a section, click on a item name (Status, Key Words, etc.) to open and close individual content items. By default, the Citation information within the Description section is always open for display.
Download: FGDC Plus Stylesheet is available from the ArcScripts downloads at www.esri.com.